Quick Index
 Adult Industry News
Search AINews Database
Type Keyword or Phrase Here
Are you TOUGH ENOUGH for Joanna Angel? EXPO 2014, August 24-27, Mandalay Bay, Las Vegas
   
 

Front Page
Film News
Media News
Business News
Clubs & Appearances
Law & Politics
Internet & Mobile News
Lifestyles Arts Health Charity
Letters to the Editor
Columns
Movie Spotlight Reviews
Interviews
Pornstar Pages
AINews Staff
Ad Rates
PR 101: Press Release Service

Caliente Nudist Vacations!

Brea Bennett at Twistys

November 30, 1999 11:58am
Court Asked To Revive Anti-Smut Law
Source: AP
by: LAURIE ASSEO

(WASHINGTON) -- The Clinton administration asked the Supreme Court today to revive a law aimed at shielding children from Playboy Television and other sexually explicit cable TV channels.

The law, struck down by a lower court, is Congress' attempt to limit "graphic, sexually explicit adult programming that is available on cable television to children with merely a flip of the dial," Justice Department lawyer James A. Feldman said.

But the lawyer for Playboy Entertainment Group called the 1996 law "a case of regulatory overkill" that would restrict programming even to households without children.

The law violates the Constitution's free-speech guarantee, and a decision to uphold it could "open a wide avenue" for regulation of other new technologies, said Playboy Entertainment lawyer Robert Corn-Revere.

Under the law, cable systems could show sex-oriented networks only during overnight hours if they did not fully scramble the signal for nonsubscribers.

Picture and sound occasionally get through to nonsubscribers when a cable channel's signal is only partly scrambled. A Florida woman complained to Congress that she found her 7- and 8-year-old children "transfixed" by sex scenes on an imperfectly scrambled channel.

A decision on whether the law went too far is expected by late June.

Feldman urged the justices to compare the measure's limits on speech with the "evil it's addressing." Government lawyers had submitted to the court examples of sex-oriented programming that children could see and hear.

"I wouldn't even read the descriptions in public," said Justice Antonin Scalia. "It seems to me obscenity," which is not constitutionally protected.

But Justice John Paul Stevens noted that the law did not address programming on other cable channels that are not primarily sex-oriented.

"We see an awful lot of strong language on WGN," Stevens said. "I'm often shocked at what I see on television."

Corn-Revere said the law would restrict all of his client's programming. "There is no distinction between hard-core pornography ... and safe-sex information if it's shown on Playboy Television."

Corn-Revere said the law contained an alternative that requires cable channel operators to block any channel, free of charge, if a customer requests it.

But Justice Stephen G. Breyer questioned having an alternative in which people have to take action to stop the signal from coming into their homes.

Breyer said that in today's world, "many, many thousands of children come home from school and there's no one there" to know what they are watching on television.

The law was enacted as part of the 1996 Communications Decency Act. Cable operators that don't fully scramble or block sex-oriented networks for nonsubscribers can show those "indecent" programs only between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m.

Playboy challenged the law as a violation of the Constitution's First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech. Indecent material is constitutionally protected, while obscene material is not.

A federal court struck down the law in December 1998, noting that another part of the law already requires cable operators to completely block any channel upon a customer's request.

The trial court said giving customers adequate notice of that choice would be a less-restrictive alternative to banning all daytime adult-oriented programming.

The Supreme Court cited free-speech protections in 1996 when it struck down parts of a federal law aimed at restricting children's exposure to indecent programs on some cable channels. The justices ruled the government cannot force cable operators to segregate all indecent programs on a single leased channel, nor can it let cable operators opt out of carrying public-access channels that feature indecent programs.

In 1997, the court ruled that Congress' effort to keep pornography off the Internet violated the First Amendment. The 1996 law made it a crime to put "indecent" or "patently offensive" words or pictures online where they could be found by children.

Are you TOUGH ENOUGH for Joanna Angel?

Related Stories

Related Sites - WARNING! Graphic Content

Casey Cumz 01

See BiBi Jones at Digital Playground

Top Stories

Farrah Abraham at Hustler Hollywood

Sex Workshop Hustler San Diego

Halloween Art Show

O Awards Pre-Noms Open

Trophy Girl Casting Call

Cum in Me Baby 4

More Phoenix Mainstream

BoodiGo Partners PornGuardian

BoodiGo Supports ASACP

BoodiGo Blocks Child Porn

Boodigo Adult Search Engine

AVN Show Discounts End Today

Inside The Industry 10/08/2014

Amber Lynn at Wasteland

Nikki's Fit as Phoenix

Vivid Extends Patrick Hosting

Fake Test Results

Angelyne on Amber Lynn's RNSU

Red Cardinal Wraps Betrothed

Siri Wins Round 2

J.Lo Doc Johnson Offer

Stripclub Microbrewery on CNN

Father's Day ~ Reviewer Rated

Our Father ~ Reviewer Rated

Nikki Phoenix Album Released

Passport to Hustler Event

Fox News Wasteland

Asianmodelpalooza 14

Nikki Phoenix Appearances

Nikki Phoenix Karaoke XXX

Nina Elle Retains Star Factory

Tasha Reign Grads UCLA

Tera Patrick Hosts Vivid Radio

It's Just Work

Traci Bryant Goes Legal

CET Free Panel Month

Miss LA Karaoke XXX

Freedom Acres Location

Summer Lovers

Nikki Delano at Centerfolds

Karen Summer Returns

Advertise on AINews

Cytherea Auctions Fan Scene

Entertainment is Entertainment is Entertainment

More
Stories From

Law & Politics

Pornstar Graduates Law School

AHF Against AB 999

CraigsErotica Letter to Senators

Amazon Crushes Small Business

Letter of Equality

ASACP Service Recognition Award

Suit Filed Challenging Measure B

ASACP Ready For Internext

Octomom Loses Civil Suit

ASACP at XBIZ 360

Crakmedia ASACP Corporate Sponsor

Mo Reese Statement

CAM4 Newest ASACP Sponsor

Mo Reese FSC Nom

Amber Lynn Seeks FSC Board

Suit Against Measure B

Law Puts Con in Condom

No on B: Here's Why

NO on B Campaign

NO on B Bus Tour

GFY: Vote No on B

Margold on Erection Election

Alex Chance in Documentary

Yahshua: No On B

No On 35 Rally

Why No On B

Measure B Threatens Freedom

Measure B Protest Video

No On B Raffle

Alia Janine: No On B

AHF Vilifies Porn

No on B Event

Alia Janine Against Measure B

Fight Measure B

Takedown Piracy Removes 10,000,000

John Stagliano Keynotes CatalystCon

Hirsch Blasts Trueman

Hirsch Cautions GOP

LATATA Files Injunction

Child Porn Hotline Increased

Vette Scores on AFF

Nicole Houde Assault Arrest

YouJizz Sued

Dickinson Defends Travolta

Kardashian/Humphries Divorce Deposition

Three Stooges Porn Controversy

Suing: Wasn't Sexy Enough

Lords of Acid Censored

Nate Glass on CNBC

Law & Politics Section Index

     
Copyright © 1998 - 2014 Adult Industry News (AINews.com)
All materials constituting text, articles, press releases, stories, columns, photographs, graphics, and code on the AINews.com domain are protected by copyright, and either owned by Adult Industry News (AINews.com), or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way, or transmitted to others, without the written permission of Adult Industry News (AINews.com).