Quick Index
 Adult Industry News
Search AINews Database
Type Keyword or Phrase Here
Pornography feminists unshackle their desires and celebrate their sexuality in the patriarchal world Elementary Public Relations Consulting and Press Release Service

Front Page
Film News
Media News
Business News
Clubs & Appearances
Law & Politics
Internet & Mobile News
Lifestyles Arts Health Charity
Letters to the Editor
Movie Spotlight Reviews
Pornstar Pages
AINews Staff
Ad Rates
PR 101: Press Release Service

Caliente Swinger Vacations!

Club Jessica Jaymes - Official Website

March 25, 2002 08:44am
Librarians Testify at Porn Law Trial
Source: Reuters
by: David Morgan

(PHILADELPHIA, PA) -- Three soft-spoken, gray-haired librarians fired the opening salvo on Monday in a constitutional battle over how far the U.S. government can go to protect children from exposure to pornography on library computers.

As an unusual constitutional trial opened in U.S. District Court, librarians from Wisconsin, Oregon and Washington warned that the Children's Internet Protection Act could undermine the role of American libraries that seek to provide adult patrons with any lawful material regardless of content or viewpoint.

"We really don't ask people why they want to know what they want to know," Ginnie Cooper, 56, director of Multnomah County Public Library in Portland, Oregon, testified in what is expected to be a nine-day trial.

Known by the acronym Cipa, the law is a third attempt by Congress to restrict access to the Internet and its estimated 11 million World Wide Web sites, about 1 percent of which experts say contain some sort of sexually explicit material.

Cipa, signed into law in 2000 by then-U.S. President Bill Clinton, would require libraries to install filtering software on computers or risk loosing millions of dollars in subsidies that provide library patrons with Internet access.

Because it does not directly impose limits on Internet access, supporters view Cipa as the government's best shot yet at controlling online smut while avoiding violations of the free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

But the American Civil Liberties Union (news - web sites) and lawyers representing a coalition of libraries, library patrons and Web site operators want a special three-judge panel to impose a permanent injunction against Cipa, saying it violates free speech rights and imposes costly burdens on libraries that would be forced to comply.

The verdict by the judicial panel headed by 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (news - web sites) Chief Judge Ed Becker will go directly to the U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites).

Despite the free speech issues raised by the trial, Becker ordered the courtroom closed to the public briefly during expert testimony that could divulge trade secrets about specific filtering software products.

The chief judge noted that the courtroom's closure could raise concerns that the law should be overturned on grounds that it could not be defended wholly in a public courtroom.

The first attempt by Congress to control online smut, the 1996 Communications Decency Act, was thrown out by the Supreme Court as an infringement of free speech. A second, the 1998 Child Online Protection Act, remains sidelined by an injunction with the U.S. high court due to issue a final opinion by mid-year. Both would impose criminal penalties on violators.

Filtering Software Faulty?

A main objection to Cipa among librarians is a section that would require adult patrons to ask that filtering software be shut off for what the statute calls "bonafide research."

"I really myself have no idea how I would say to someone: 'Why do you want this?'," said Peter Hamon, 56, director of Madison, Wisconsin's South Central Library System.

Plaintiffs in the case, who have named the Federal Communications Commission (news - web sites) and the Institute of Museum and Library Sciences as defendants, also maintain that filtering software is faulty in two ways -- it either blocks Web sites that are not objectionable or allows access to some that are.

"None of the programs currently available can accomplish their stated task of filtering out sexually explicit material," testified Geoffrey Nunberg, a Stanford University linguistics professor who studied several software products on the market.

Some critics view Cipa as a ploy by social conservatives to restrict access to sites that discuss homosexuality and abortion rights.

Pornography feminists unshackle their desires and celebrate their sexuality in the patriarchal world

Related Stories

Related Sites - WARNING! Graphic Content


See BiBi Jones at Digital Playground

Top Stories

Dead But Dreaming ~ Reviewer Rated

MWA: 05/12/16

Dava Foxx Self-Booking

Gina Valentina's 1st IR

MWA: 04/28/16

Submission of Emma Marx: Exposed ~ Reviewer Rated

BBWcon 2016

New Webcam Opportunity

NaughtyAllie Facelift

Nina Elle MiniView

Kahlista Stonem Available

Sanders, Trump Joint News Conference

Naughty Massage

Redefining the Status Quo

Jenevieve Hexxx at Trixie's

Ocean News from Lexi Love

Hard Squeezes

APAC and Sex Worker Rights

New From Rodney Moore

RNSU Radio Thurs March 24

New Girls

What We Signed Up For

The Directors

What is Consent?

MWA: 03/16/16

MWA: 03/12/16

Bee, Evans at Sexpo

New Gay News Site

MWA: 02/28/16

Alana Evans on MTV

MWA: 02/17/16

Sexpo Cosplay

MWA: 02/13/16 AVN AEE 2016

Cruz Receives Porn Offer

MWA: 02/12/16

Poking Around AVN 2016

Deadly Famous

Planet Venus

The Hedge Against Exploitation

Performers File Unpaid Wage Claims

Stories From

Law & Politics

Sanders, Trump Joint News Conference

Cruz Receives Porn Offer

Performers File Unpaid Wage Claims

Candidate Sex Tape Scandal

Donald Trump Porn Parody

Sex with Donald Trump

Hof Runs for Senate

Adult's Achilles Heel

AHF's Hidden Agenda

Pistol, Ross Talk Condoms

Modern Comstockery

Hof on Phoenix Hooker Bust

Cal/OSHA vs Evil Angel

Pornstar Graduates Law School

AHF Against AB 999

CraigsErotica Letter to Senators

Amazon Crushes Small Business

Letter of Equality

ASACP Service Recognition Award

Suit Filed Challenging Measure B

ASACP Ready For Internext

Octomom Loses Civil Suit


Crakmedia ASACP Corporate Sponsor

Mo Reese Statement

CAM4 Newest ASACP Sponsor

Mo Reese FSC Nom

Amber Lynn Seeks FSC Board

Suit Against Measure B

Law Puts Con in Condom

No on B: Here's Why

NO on B Campaign

NO on B Bus Tour

GFY: Vote No on B

Margold on Erection Election

Alex Chance in Documentary

Yahshua: No On B

No On 35 Rally

Why No On B

Measure B Threatens Freedom

Measure B Protest Video

No On B Raffle

Alia Janine: No On B

AHF Vilifies Porn

No on B Event

Takedown Piracy Removes 10,000,000

Three Stooges Porn Controversy

Suing: Wasn't Sexy Enough

Lords of Acid Censored

Nate Glass on CNBC

Law & Politics Section Index

Copyright © 1998 - 2016 Adult Industry News (AINews.com)
All materials constituting text, articles, press releases, stories, columns, photographs, graphics, and code on the AINews.com domain are protected by copyright, and either owned by Adult Industry News (AINews.com), or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way, or transmitted to others, without the written permission of Adult Industry News (AINews.com).