Quick Index
 Adult Industry News
Search AINews Database
Type Keyword or Phrase Here
Advertise with AINews Pornography feminists unshackle their desires and celebrate their sexuality in the patriarchal world

Front Page
Film News
Media News
Business News
Clubs & Appearances
Law & Politics
Internet & Mobile News
Lifestyles Arts Health Charity
Letters to the Editor
Movie Spotlight Reviews
Pornstar Pages
AINews Staff
Ad Rates
PR 101: Press Release Service

Porn for GEEKS! Meet me & my friends!

Kayden Kross at Twistys

February 17, 2000 10:50pm
The Oral Sex Muddle
Source: News Wire

A wave of scary early February headlines about the dangers of oral sex has produced dismay and confusion among gay men and others nationwide. Surprisingly, one of those most dismayed was Frederick Hecht, MD, University of California San Francisco (UCSF) researcher and co-author of the study that generated all those headlines.

"I think our data are pretty similar to other data that has come out," Hecht told PlanetOut News. "We're a little surprised by the amount of attention it drew."

On Feb. 1 a team of researchers from UCSF and the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) presented data at a San Francisco medical conference indicating that eight of 122 men newly infected with HIV almost certainly got infected via oral sex. Most experts agree with Hecht that this latest report did not significantly change what scientists have long understood: HIV can be transmitted via oral sex, but oral transmission is much more difficult and less common than transmission via anal or vaginal intercourse. And virtually all of the well-documented cases of oral transmission reported in the medical literature have involved ejaculation in the receptive partner's mouth.

But media coverage of the study generally ignored such subtleties. The Associated Press headlined its story, "AIDS Study: Danger of Oral Sex High." And the Los Angeles Times stated flatly, "At least 8 percent of all cases of HIV infection result from oral sex, according to researchers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."

Beside getting the percentage wrong (eight out of 122 is 6.6 percent), the Times leaped far beyond what the researchers had actually said. While the published study abstract (available at http://www.retroconference.org/2000/abstracts/473.htm) states, "Despite lower transmission risk, oral sex may be an important mode of HIV transmission due to its frequency," the scientists never claimed that the percentages found in their relatively small sample could be generalized to the whole population.

What they did say, Hecht explained, is that gay men may have become a bit too sanguine about the safety of oral sex. "There is some risk," he said. "The basic message should be that if you have enough lower-risk behavior, it can be a more substantial mode through which people are infected. In earlier messages that oral sex is safer, the "er" has been dropped off and people have assumed that oral sex is safe."

While there is abundant evidence that receptive anal sex without a condom is the major route of sexual transmission among gay men, there have been numerous reports in the medical literature of HIV transmission via oral sex. In 1996, for example, researchers from the University of Washington reported that four out of 46 newly-infected patients they studied had no identifiable risk factors other than oral sex.

But it has been hard for researchers to develop a precise estimate of the risk involved. Kenneth Mayer, MD, director of medical research at Fenway Community Health in Boston, noted, "The trouble has been that a lot of people who have anal sex also have oral sex, so it's hard to know what the source of the infection is." Another complicating factor, he added, is that since HIV is fairly difficult to transmit, researchers "have to follow a huge number of people" to develop meaningful data.

The most recent and oft-quoted attempt to determine the risk levels of various sexual acts, a CDC study published last year in the American Journal of Epidemiology, estimated that unprotected receptive oral sex has a per-contact risk of .04 percent, or one in 2,500. This compared to .082, one in 122, for unprotected anal sex.

But that estimate came with a boatload of qualifications and limitations, starting with the fact that it assumed a partner of unknown serostatus. And though the data was based on a sample of 1,583 men followed for just over a year, there were only 49 seroconversions during the study. If just one or two misreported or misremembered their sexual activities or other HIV risks, it might skew the data substantially.

What frustrates many is that media headlines saying "oral sex is risky" give little useful guidance for individuals wanting to decrease their risk. Justin Hayford, a case manager at the AIDS Legal Council of Chicago, complained in a message posted on the Internet newsgroup sci.med.aids, "Is anyone ever going to bother to talk about HOW oral sex is risky and WHEN the risk arises? We need to know HOW and WHEN oral sex is risky, and to whom."

Actually, the existing data, including Hecht's study, does provide some guidance, but that information has often been left out of media coverage of the subject and is sometimes omitted or glossed over in the scientific reports themselves. One thing that is clear is that in the overwhelming majority of reported cases, HIV was passed from the insertive partner to the receptive one (that is, from the person being sucked to the one doing the sucking). There is just a tiny handful of reports of HIV being passed to the insertive partner, and the general consensus is that the risk to the suckee, while probably not zero, is extremely low.

In addition, ejaculation in the mouth appears to be an important factor. Mayer said flatly, "There's no convincing data that anybody's been infected by a partner that didn't ejaculate in their mouth." Still, he noted, "a few anecdotes" of such transmission have appeared as letters in medical journals, so the possibility can't be entirely ruled out.

Unfortunately, the medical literature often isn't as detailed as it might be. For example, the formal presentation by Hecht's group did not mention the issue of ejaculation, but in our interview he stated that seven out of the eight oral seroconverters acknowledged having had their partner ejaculate in their mouth. The 1999 CDC study mentioned above only looked at oral sex that included ejaculation, while some published studies haven't even asked the question.

Another presumed risk factor often unaddressed in the literature is the presence of sores or lesions in the receptive partner's mouth. The Seattle study, for instance, made no mention of this issue. It wasn't mentioned in the new UCSF/CDC report either, but Hecht said that "about half" of the eight seroconverters reported having mouth sores or some other dental condition that might facilitate entry of the virus. He said the researchers were still reviewing the data to confirm that figure.

Scientists face considerable difficulties in accumulating accurate data, starting with the fact that all of it depends on people's ability to remember and willingness to report the details of their sexual behavior. Still, Mayer said, "There are several of us who've said for years that we could have much better data" about oral sex than we do now. Mayer urged the CDC to fund a study looking at gay men who do not have anal sex at all as one way of obtaining clearer information.

In the meantime, the only risk-free option is to avoid unprotected oral sex entirely. Failing that, two precautions seem clearly advisable, most experts agree. First, avoid performing oral sex if you have any cuts or sores in your mouth or gums. Second, and perhaps most critical, is to agree with your partner at the outset that you will not ejaculate in each other's mouths. If that simple message could be given to gay men worldwide, Mayer said, "it would be a great public service."

Advertise with AINews

Related Sites - WARNING! Graphic Content



Top Stories

Black Loads Matter

Alexis Amore to Hall of Fame

Baumgartners Wins Best Polyamory

Ryder Wins Best Screenplay

PPK = Porn Party Karaoke

Losers Never Get Laid ~ Reviewer Rated

Pornstar Signature Series

LewdWork Adult Job Board

Scott Taylor Interview

MWA: 01/16/18

Happy New Year 2018

MWA: 12/26/17

MWA: 12/21/17

2018 AVN Awards Nominees

MWA: 12/16/17

MWA: 12/10/17

MWA: 12/09/17

A Season for Hope

MWA: 12/06/17

MWA: 12/05/17

Gonzo with Eddie Powell

Guild Demands New HIV Testing!

ED Award Winners

MWA: 11/07/17

Burlesque Documentary

Farrah Abraham Fired for Porn Return

Heaven and Hell 2017

Stories From

Lifestyles Arts Health Charity

Happy New Year 2018

A Season for Hope

Guild Demands New HIV Testing!

Help Heal Rhiannon

Bill Margold Memorial Fund

Take Care and Care Take

Bill Margold Memorial (UPDATED)

Bill Margold Died

TTS Discount at LV Office

Goodbye 2016, Hello 2017!

Happy Xanukkah, Merry XXXmas

Rodney Moore Covers Glen Campbell Song

DomCon New Orleans

APAG Support Group

Elizabeth Starr May Lose Breasts

Sheri's Ranch Joint Venture

CineKink Oakland 9/8

Skirt Club Party

Sex Workers Anthem

Fetish Con Party Schedule

Nadia Ali Interview

Freedom Acres Party

Porn Star by Herschel Savage

CatalystCon Sessions, Speakers

Naughty Massage

Ocean News from Lexi Love

Happy New Year 2016!

See Jack Napier

Merry XXXmas, Happy Xanukkah

Calvert Joins Gamelink

Richelle Ryan Naked Yoga

Sheri's Ranch Views Prostitutes

Candida Royalle Passes

Cleopatra Dead

Danger Builds Darth Vibrader

Vice is Nice Event

D Wise Fights for Life

Freedom Acres Anniversary Party

Girlfriends Celebrates Caitlyn Jenner

Welcome 2015!

Actress as an Artist

Merry XXXmas, Happy Xanukkah

Pushed Into the Corner

Bright Lights, Lonely Nights

Halloween Art Show

Sex Workshop Hustler San Diego

Fake Test Results

CET Free Panel Month

TTS Welcomes Bobi & Jen

Cutting Edge Changes Staff

Next Day Test in LV

Copyright © 1998 - 2018 Adult Industry News (AINews.com)
All materials constituting text, articles, press releases, stories, columns, photographs, graphics, and code on the AINews.com domain are protected by copyright, and either owned by Adult Industry News (AINews.com), or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way, or transmitted to others, without the written permission of Adult Industry News (AINews.com).