Quick Index
 Adult Industry News
Search AINews Database
Type Keyword or Phrase Here
Advertise with AINews Pornography feminists unshackle their desires and celebrate their sexuality in the patriarchal world

Front Page
Film News
Media News
Business News
Clubs & Appearances
Law & Politics
Internet & Mobile News
Lifestyles Arts Health Charity
Letters to the Editor
Movie Spotlight Reviews
Pornstar Pages
AINews Staff
Ad Rates
PR 101: Press Release Service

Porn for GEEKS! Meet me & my friends!

Brea Bennett at Twistys

July 23, 2001 01:50pm
Judge: U.S. Internet smut law may go to trial
Source: Reuters
by: David Morgan

(PHILADELPHIA, PA) -- A free-speech challenge to a new U.S. law designed to protect children from pornography on the Internet may go to trial next February despite a government bid to get the case dismissed, a judge suggested on Monday.

A coalition of public libraries, library patrons and Web site operators filed the challenge in March against the Children's Internet Protection Act of 2000, which would withhold federal funds from libraries and schools that fail to install smut-filtering software on personal computers.

The Justice Department, which is representing the Federal Communications Commission and the Institute of Museum and Library Services in the suit, asked a federal court in Philadelphia to dismiss the case saying the challenge is without merit.

But on Monday, the U.S. appellate judge who heads a special three-judge panel set up to oversee the case, said the constitutional questions raised by the lawsuit appear too numerous and too complex to be examined without a full-blown trial, which was tentatively scheduled for Feb. 14, 2002.

``There are a zillion issues here,'' Chief Judge Edward Becker of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals told a team of Justice Department attorneys during an hour-long hearing.

``This case is unquestionably destined for the United States Supreme Court, is it not? ... Wouldn't this court and the Supreme Court be much better equipped to deal with this after discovery and after trial?'' he asked.

Former U.S. President Bill Clinton signed the Children's Internet Protection Act into law in December. It was the federal government's latest attempt to control pornography on the Internet after two earlier attempts were stymied.

In 1997, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the 1996 Communications Decency Act saying it infringed upon free speech. And in 1999, a U.S. district judge in Philadelphia issued an injunction against the 1998 Child Online Protection Act. That matter will be argued before the high court in the fall.

Three-dozen plaintiffs, headed by the American Library Association and the American Civil Liberties Union, allege the Children's Internet Protection Act violates free speech rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs argue that installing the pornography-filtering software constrains the ability of adults to access lawful material, including Web sites of interest to homosexuals and women's groups.

They also complain that the law could leave individual librarians to determine what adults accessing the Internet should be allowed to see.

``We say the traditional role of libraries is to provide material that the patrons want, not material that libraries and librarians believe are correct,'' ACLU senior staff counsel Chris Hansen said.

But Justice Department attorney Rupa Bhattacharyya, arguing that the challenge was without merit, reminded the three judges that the law does not constrain free speech but simply imposes conditions on libraries that choose to accept federal money.

``The government is not required to subsidize the exercise of the first amendment. The government is not required to subsidize Internet access,'' she said. ``Libraries were given money to connect themselves to the Internet for educational purposes.''

Public libraries that fail to comply with the Internet law would risk losing government-provided discounts on Internet access, as well as federal grants. The library association, which represents 3,000 public libraries, said the amount of money in question totals about $215 million a year.

Becker said the panel would rule later on whether the case should be dismissed, but set no deadline for a decision.

Advertise with AINews



Top Stories

MWA: 02/18/2018

Misty Stone Goes Mainstream

Black Loads Matter

Alexis Amore to Hall of Fame

Baumgartners Wins Best Polyamory

Ryder Wins Best Screenplay

PPK = Porn Party Karaoke

Losers Never Get Laid ~ Reviewer Rated

Pornstar Signature Series

LewdWork Adult Job Board

Scott Taylor Interview

MWA: 01/16/18

Happy New Year 2018

MWA: 12/26/17

MWA: 12/21/17

2018 AVN Awards Nominees

MWA: 12/16/17

MWA: 12/10/17

MWA: 12/09/17

A Season for Hope

MWA: 12/06/17

MWA: 12/05/17

Gonzo with Eddie Powell

Guild Demands New HIV Testing!

ED Award Winners

MWA: 11/07/17

Burlesque Documentary

Farrah Abraham Fired for Porn Return

Heaven and Hell 2017

Stories From

Law & Politics

Prop 60, Part One

Prop 60, Part Two

Official APAG Statement

Darling Running for Assembly

Possible Identity Theft

Bunny Ranch Special

Prop 60 Defeated

Tarts for Trump

Darcy Tyler Jailed

Weiner Offered Media Director

Julia Ann Against Prop 60

Pedophile Olympic Coaches Exposed

Law & Politics Section Index

Alice Polls Her Clients

What Prop 60 Really Is

IEAU Statement on Prop 60

FLOTUS Shatters Porn Search Records

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Offered $50K

Cruz Receives Porn Offer

Performers File Unpaid Wage Claims

Candidate Sex Tape Scandal

Donald Trump Porn Parody

Sex with Donald Trump

Hof Runs for Senate

Hookers for Hillary

Adult's Achilles Heel

AHF's Hidden Agenda

Pistol, Ross Talk Condoms

Modern Comstockery

Hof on Phoenix Hooker Bust

Cal/OSHA vs Evil Angel

Pornstar Graduates Law School

AHF Against AB 999

CraigsErotica Letter to Senators

Amazon Crushes Small Business

Letter of Equality

ASACP Service Recognition Award

Suit Filed Challenging Measure B

ASACP Ready For Internext

Octomom Loses Civil Suit


Crakmedia ASACP Corporate Sponsor

Mo Reese Statement

CAM4 Newest ASACP Sponsor

Takedown Piracy Removes 10,000,000

Three Stooges Porn Controversy

Suing: Wasn't Sexy Enough

Lords of Acid Censored

Nate Glass on CNBC

Copyright © 1998 - 2018 Adult Industry News (AINews.com)
All materials constituting text, articles, press releases, stories, columns, photographs, graphics, and code on the AINews.com domain are protected by copyright, and either owned by Adult Industry News (AINews.com), or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way, or transmitted to others, without the written permission of Adult Industry News (AINews.com).