Quick Index
 Adult Industry News
Search AINews Database
Type Keyword or Phrase Here
EXPO 2015, August 23-26, New Orleans
   
 

Front Page
Film News
Media News
Business News
Clubs & Appearances
Law & Politics
Internet & Mobile News
Lifestyles Arts Health Charity
Letters to the Editor
Columns
Movie Spotlight Reviews
Interviews
Pornstar Pages
AINews Staff
Ad Rates
PR 101: Press Release Service

Caliente Swinger Vacations!

Brea Bennett at Twistys

October 01, 1999 01:48pm
Clash Between Art and Politics? Been There, Dung That
Source: ABCNEWS.com
by: Geraldine Sealey

NEW YORK — A powerful politician opposes an avant-garde New York art exhibit featuring shocking pieces by European artists. The politician blasts the exhibit, calling it “anarchism in art.”

Sound familiar?

Actually, this scenario does not describe the current conflict between New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and the Brooklyn Museum of Art over the upcoming British exhibit “Sensation,” which features a black Madonna sprinkled with elephant dung and pictorial cutouts of genitalia.

Instead, the year was 1913 and the politician in question was Theodore Roosevelt.

At issue was the groundbreaking 69th-regiment Armory Show held in New York City to showcase an estimated 1,600 pieces representing avant-garde movements in Europe.

Among the pieces was Marcel Duchamp’s Nude Descending a Staircase, singled out by critics like Roosevelt as symbolizing the degeneracy of modern art. Despite hostile critics, the Armory Show aroused public curiosity and became one of the most important art exhibits ever held in the United States.

Indeed, the current flap over the Brooklyn Museum of Art is nothing new, art historians say. Instead, tension and conflict have been common in the relationship between art and politics through the years in America, especially when public funding is at stake.

Why Here? “Every time in the history of the United States when there’s been public funds expended on the arts, someone in government has taken the purse strings and attached conditions,” said Steven Dubin, director of the Media, Society and the Arts Program at Purchase College, State University of New York.

Since the late 1980s, we’ve seen the controversies over National Endowment for the Arts funding for Andres Serrano’s Piss Christ, Robert Mapplethorpe’s homoerotic photography and the performance art of Karen Finley.

But why is this common in the United States, home of the First Amendment?

According to Peter Hales, professor of art history at the University of Illinois at Chicago, the conflict has two facets.

First, he says, art museums in America have been viewed largely as reflective of the democratic will — representing the majority, not the fringe. Any artwork that strays from the most common denominator is a potential target for public ire.

“This is very different from European cultural institutions, which are seen by their traditions as having a function to challenge and to interject, to query,” he said.

The Politics of Art But a more disturbing factor, Hales said, is the inclination of some modern political figures to curry favor with the public by targeting those art exhibits not deemed acceptable to the mainstream.

“There’s a tendency of American politicians to exploit the anti-intellectual suspicion of the arts as elitist to gain votes,” he said.

Dubin agrees.

“There’s an enormous cynical element,” he said. “Most politicians don’t care about art. It provides a lightning rod. It’s a very visible target.”

Giuliani and other politicians, of course, see their pursuit as anything but cynical. To the mayor, if the Brooklyn exhibit is offensive to some — Catholics, for example — it should not receive public funds.

“If somebody wants to do that privately and pay for it privately, well, that’s what the First Amendment is all about,” said Giuliani, who is expected to run for the U.S. Senate. “But to have the government subsidize something like that is outrageous.”

In the Brooklyn case, the museum has filed a lawsuit claiming its First Amendment rights are being violated by the city’s pledge to cut $7 million of its funding. But it is unclear whether the government actually has the right to strip funds from exhibits it considers offensive, legal experts say.

Case law in this area is uncomfortably murky. There have been three Supreme Court rulings related to this matter since 1991, but the court’s standard is less than clear. The Brooklyn case may help clarify the law in this area, but probably not entirely.

“In the absence of case law,” said Robert O’Neil, professor of law at the University of Virginia, “we are inevitably subject to debates and disputes of the type that’s now going on and will be for some time to come.”


Related Stories

Related Sites - WARNING! Graphic Content

Casey Cumz 01

See BiBi Jones at Digital Playground

Top Stories

Adult's Achilles Heel

AHF's Hidden Agenda

New Smash VP Wyatt Case

Ink Inks OC, The Rub

National Porn Star Day

Pistol, Ross Talk Condoms

XXX Casting Call

Direct Reps Harper

AJ Applegate Available

Emma Marx: Boundaries ~ Reviewer Rated

Strippers Ready for Baseball

RAW Signs Sasha Bradshaw

Modern Comstockery

Nikki Phoenix Appearance

Rock’N’SeXXXy Welcomes Billy Blair

Karaoke XXX Needs New Location

Jane & Ward Hosting XRCO

SashaBrabuster's XXX Comeback

Control ~ Reviewer Rated

XRCO 2015 Nominees

A Leaner Message

MWA: 02/26/15

50 Shades of Grey ~ Cinema Seen

XRCO 2015 Hall of Fame

Interview with Ela Darling

Derrick Pierce Interview

The News Rack: Naked Swingers

MWA: 02/07/15

Interview of Holly Heart

ED Expo to Big Easy

More
Stories From

Law & Politics

Adult's Achilles Heel

AHF's Hidden Agenda

Pistol, Ross Talk Condoms

Modern Comstockery

Hof on Phoenix Hooker Bust

Cal/OSHA vs Evil Angel

Pornstar Graduates Law School

AHF Against AB 999

CraigsErotica Letter to Senators

Amazon Crushes Small Business

Letter of Equality

ASACP Service Recognition Award

Suit Filed Challenging Measure B

ASACP Ready For Internext

Octomom Loses Civil Suit

ASACP at XBIZ 360

Crakmedia ASACP Corporate Sponsor

Mo Reese Statement

CAM4 Newest ASACP Sponsor

Mo Reese FSC Nom

Amber Lynn Seeks FSC Board

Suit Against Measure B

Law Puts Con in Condom

No on B: Here's Why

NO on B Campaign

NO on B Bus Tour

GFY: Vote No on B

Margold on Erection Election

Alex Chance in Documentary

Yahshua: No On B

No On 35 Rally

Why No On B

Measure B Threatens Freedom

Measure B Protest Video

No On B Raffle

Alia Janine: No On B

AHF Vilifies Porn

No on B Event

Alia Janine Against Measure B

Fight Measure B

Takedown Piracy Removes 10,000,000

John Stagliano Keynotes CatalystCon

Hirsch Blasts Trueman

Hirsch Cautions GOP

LATATA Files Injunction

Child Porn Hotline Increased

Vette Scores on AFF

Nicole Houde Assault Arrest

YouJizz Sued

Dickinson Defends Travolta

Kardashian/Humphries Divorce Deposition

Three Stooges Porn Controversy

Suing: Wasn't Sexy Enough

Lords of Acid Censored

Nate Glass on CNBC

Law & Politics Section Index

     
Copyright © 1998 - 2015 Adult Industry News (AINews.com)
All materials constituting text, articles, press releases, stories, columns, photographs, graphics, and code on the AINews.com domain are protected by copyright, and either owned by Adult Industry News (AINews.com), or reproduced with permission from other copyright owners. It may be downloaded and printed for personal reference, but not otherwise copied, altered in any way, or transmitted to others, without the written permission of Adult Industry News (AINews.com).